An insurance
policy should not contain provisions that allow one side or the other to unilaterally
void the contract in exchange for benefit. Provisions that void the contract for
failure to perform or for fraud or material misrepresentation are ordinary and
acceptable. The policy should have a term of not more than about three years.
This is not a hard and fast rule. Contracts of over five years duration are classified
as ‘long-term,’ which can impact the accounting treatment, and can obviously introduce
the possibility that over the entire term of the contract, no actual risk will
transfer. The coverage provided by the contract need not cease at the end of the
term (e.g., the contract can cover occurrences as opposed to claims made or claims
paid). The contract should be considered to include any other agreements,
written or oral, that confer rights, create obligations, or create benefits on
the part of either or both parties. Ideally, the contract should contain an ‘Entire
Agreement’ clause that assures there are no undisclosed written or oral side agreements
that confer rights, create obligations, or create benefits on the part of either
or both parties. If such rights, obligations or benefits exist, they must be factored
into the tests of reasonableness and significance. The contract should not
contain arbitrary limitations on timing of payments. Provisions that assure both
parties of time to properly present and consider claims are acceptable provided
they are commercially reasonable and customary. Provisions that expressly
create actual or notional accounts that accrue actual or notional interest suggest
that the contract contains, in fact, a deposit. Provisions for additional
or return premium do not, in and of themselves, render a contract something other
than insurance. However, it should be unlikely that either a return or additional
premium provision be triggered, and neither party should have discretion regarding
the timing of such triggering. All of the events that would give rise to
claims under the contract cannot have materialized prior to the inception of the
contract. If this "all events" test is not met, then the contract is
considered to be a retroactive contract, for which the accounting treatment becomes
complex. Reference: www.wikipedia.org
|